--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Cradle? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Cradle gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cradle - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Cradle](/software/78756/cradle) # Cradle Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/78756/cradle Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/78756/cradle?page=2) > La solución completa de gestión de requisitos para sistemas y proyectos de ingeniería de procesos. > > Veredicto: 27 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Cradle? Cualquier persona que desarrolle sistemas con funcionalidad. Los mercados típicos son los de las áreas aeroespacial, automotriz, defensa, finanzas, gobierno, fabricación, nuclear, control de procesos, telecomunicaciones y transporte. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 27 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 3.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.8/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: 3SL - **Ubicación**: Barrow-in-Furness, RU - **Constitución**: 1987 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$ 449,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Antigua y Barbuda, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belice, Bielorrusia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Brasil, Bulgaria, Bélgica, Canadá, Chequia, China, Chipre, Ciudad del Vaticano, Corea del Sur y 59 más ## Funciones - Controles o permisos de acceso - Gestión del cambio - Priorización ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Microsoft Word ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Asistencia telefónica - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.co/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.co/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.co/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.co/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.capterra.co/software/135649/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Customers In Mind" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *30 de agosto de 2018* | Aviación y aeroespacial | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The developers kept the customer in mind when creating the tool. The user interface is very accommodating and easy to use. Capability to collaborate with other tools very helpful and a top requirement when choosing the right tool. The customer service is excellent\! Always available and willing to work with the customer to the needs. > > **Puntos en contra**: I have not run into any cons. I’m impressed with the tool. > > I’m extremely impressed with the tool. I even enjoy having the capability to work in a sandbox area for practice. Training to excellent\! ----- ### "Requirements Engineering Software - could not manage without it" — 4.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *30 de agosto de 2018* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Designed to manage engineering and operational requirements first. Will handle software requirements as well, but I like the fact that it uses terms recognised by civil, mechanical, electrical, marine, aerospace, automotive, nuclear engineers. Second important plus point is its graphical capability. To be able to show how a requirement links to a process or an organisation brings the whole subject of RE to life making it so much simpler to ensure users can record all their requirements and that they can verify that they have been met. > > **Puntos en contra**: The user interface is very traditional and is ready for a facelift. It works well for requirements engineers but is not as intuitive as would be needed for infrequent access and use by business users. > > From the initial engagement with the staff at 3SL through implementation and support we have been well supported. The few gaps we found for our particular use of have been filled as an enhancement, initially for us, but then will become part of the core product. A very responsive organisation. The flexibility of its metamodel (Schema) has allowed us to extend our use well beyond traditional Requirements Engineering. Where will Cradle take us next? ----- ### "Cradle Life" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *29 de agosto de 2018* | Entretenimiento | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Modeling, Requirement Management, Click and Drag objects. Can support almost any SE task. Full SE life-cycle support capabilities. > > **Puntos en contra**: Performance, Web Access, Older looking, Proprietary Database, Difficult to integrate with other systems. Sometimes that amount of functionality makes it hard to remember how to use the system unless you are in it every day. > > I have been working with Cradle for the past 12 years and have not found a SE tool with Cradles functionality. Other tools do not allow you to follow the complete System Engineering Process from Modeling all the way to retirement. ----- ### "Usage and Administration of CRADLE" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *30 de agosto de 2018* | Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It covers almost every task you may encounter during requirements management process. If you get used to the interface it is very flexible and can easily be adopted to specific needs. The text format of the Cradle export files allows a lot of additional (specific) data processing. > > **Puntos en contra**: Actually I'm missing privileges to restrict link management (especially deleting a link). For people typically working with Microsoft Office application, the usage of CRADLE requires a change in mindset (but this may also be a 'Pros'). The upgrade process is really challenging for our IT. The direct connection of server and client version leads to a 1-day shutdown of CRADLE and parallel distributing of the clients to a lot of computers. The Document Publisher is really hard to use. Template definition requires a lot of effert and experiments until it is running. The publishing process is too time consuming. > > I think its a perfect tool to implement a process for requirements engineering at least to the level we are using it. (We don't do any modelling os far, also no systems engineering.) ----- ### "A very valuable and customizable RM Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *30 de agosto de 2018* | Petróleo y energía | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: CRADLE is a very mature solution, pefectly suitable for large scale requirements engineering projects. It can perfectly be adapted to any business model, process, allowing very specific customization (using an API for interface developments interacting with the tools database). Data access control can be tailored to match a projects organization, data configuration management is very precisely ensured. A wide range of file formats is proposed for interfaces with the external world (for imports, exports, or as attachments) 3SL Team offers a very good support and service when required. > > **Puntos en contra**: The interface of the client could be considered as a bit stark and old fashioned. (we did not worked with web interfaces) Unfortunately, only one baseline can be open at a time, validated alternatives could only be managed using distinct objects. User experience for Verification \& Validation process (using workflows) could be enhanced (reviews by validator is to be preferably done using XLS exports) Source document import using Doc Loader (Word format) can be a difficult experience for docs with complex structure, and could allow more possibilities (table patterns) ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/78756/cradle?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/78756/cradle) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados