--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Basecamp? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Basecamp gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de colaboración](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/56808/basecamp Página: 1 de 578\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Con la confianza de millones, Basecamp pone todo lo que necesitas para realizar tu trabajo en un solo lugar. > > Veredicto: 14419 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Basecamp? Empresarios, trabajadores autónomos, pequeñas empresas y grupos dentro de grandes organizaciones. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 14419 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Basecamp - **Ubicación**: Chicago, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 1999 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$ 15,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 207 más ## Funciones - @menciones - Acceso móvil - Alertas y notificaciones - Arrastrar y soltar - Autorizaciones basadas en roles - Búsqueda/filtro - Chat en tiempo real - Chat en vivo - Chat y mensajería - Comentarios/notas - Configuración de flujos de trabajo - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de informes y estadísticas - Discussions/Forums - Encuestas y comentarios - Feed de actividad y noticias - Gestión de asignaciones - Gestión de calendarios - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de ideas - Gestión de la comunicación - Gestión de plazos de entrega - Gestión de tareas - Herramientas de colaboración - Hoja de ruta del producto - Mensajería - Modelos personalizables - Panel de actividades - Planificación y programación de proyectos - Priorización - Seguimiento de creación de informes y proyectos - Seguimiento de hitos - Seguimiento de progreso de tareas - Seguimiento del avance - Seguimiento del proyecto - Seguimiento del tiempo - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations - Uso compartido de archivos ## Integraciones (en total: 93) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe … y 78 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.capterra.co/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de colaboración](https://www.capterra.co/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Herramientas de gestión de tareas](https://www.capterra.co/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Herramientas para trabajar en equipo](https://www.capterra.co/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Software de gestión de proyectos sin fines de lucro](https://www.capterra.co/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.co/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9243 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15378 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13577 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.co/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23537 reviews) 5. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6040 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *21 de mayo de 2026* | Gestión de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **Puntos en contra**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23 de abril de 2026* | Servicios jurídicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Puntos en contra**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Small Scale Project Management" — 3.0/5 > **Matilda** | *12 de mayo de 2026* | Educación superior | Valoración de la recomendación: 4.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I like that it was fairly easy to set up different projects\! It was nice to see all to dos in one space and keep an eye on all the projects you're working on. > > **Puntos en contra**: It wasn't the best for complex projects. A lot of our projects can span multiple years and cross different teams and I found Basecamp lacked the infrastructure to allow us to easily work on these more complex projects. > > For the time I worked with it I found that we were able to successfully accomplish our projects but as our team and scope expanded, we ultimately out grew the abilities of Basecamp. ----- ### "Not the most user-friendly app" — 3.0/5 > **Caitie** | *27 de marzo de 2026* | Salud, bienestar y deporte | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I didn't find basecamp to be very user friendly, the interface is a bit scattered and confusing, and I didn't like the way it was organized. > > **Puntos en contra**: The interface, the difficulty of finding where things were, and the constant confusion when trying to navigate within the app. > > I wasn't impressed with basecamp overall. As mentioned I had a tough time finding where things were and staying organized in the app. ----- ### "The simple project management system a hectic billing team can at least stick with." — 4.0/5 > **Frank** | *26 de abril de 2026* | Artículos de lujo y joyería | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: All my team will need to work with is in one location and no one will need a tutorial to locate it. Such simplicity is actually worth something when individuals are working on things and not on learning software. > > **Puntos en contra**: Experienced two annoying bugs when sharing files with the team, where the attachments could not load. A glitch like that is difficult to ignore in a billing environment where accuracy of documents is a concern. > > Basecamp has introduced a serene organization to our project organization process at Kilarys. The calendar enables the financial deadlines to be visible and the flat pricing reduced the internal budget dialogue to a very short one. ----- Página: 1 de 578\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/56808/basecamp) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados