--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de TraceCloud? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de TraceCloud gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TraceCloud - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [TraceCloud](/software/135649/tracecloud) # TraceCloud Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/135649/tracecloud Página: 1 de 4\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/135649/tracecloud?page=2) > Solución de gestión y trazabilidad de requisitos fácil de usar, en línea, en las instalaciones y en ServiceNow > > Veredicto: 67 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.1/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa TraceCloud? Grandes proyectos, ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.1/5** | 67 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.7/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: TraceCloud - **Constitución**: 2008 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$ 60,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: alemán, español, francés, inglés, portugués, portugués de Brasil, portugués de Portugal - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Australia, Brasil, Bélgica, Canadá, Estados Unidos, Finlandia, Francia, Irlanda, Italia, Noruega, Nueva Zelanda, Países Bajos, Reino Unido, Suecia ## Funciones - Gestión del cambio - Priorización ## Integraciones (en total: 1) - Jira ## Opciones de asistencia - Asistencia 24/7 - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de requisitos](https://www.capterra.co/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.co/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.capterra.co/software/162954/reqsuite) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 3. [ReqView](https://www.capterra.co/software/145388/reqview) — 4.6/5 (49 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 5. [Aha\!](https://www.capterra.co/software/144020/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Good software with a low barrier to entry" — 5.0/5 > **Alan** | *31 de marzo de 2025* | Energías renovables y medio ambiente | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The support is excellent, and the pricing model allows for a low barrier to entry for a small teams like ours. I also like that TraceCloud seems capable of being tailored into a wide range of different requirements workflows. > > **Puntos en contra**: The user interface isn't always perfectly intuitive. A good deal of options are accessible primarily through context menus, which occasionally left me uncertain about where in the tree to right-click. That being said, once you get the hang of it, there's no problem. > > I enjoyed working with the software and look forward to further integrating it into our workflows. ----- ### "Tracecloud implementation and usability PoV" — 4.0/5 > **DEBORA** | *30 de septiembre de 2024* | Investigación | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is a sctrictly methodical product, so when you take advantage of all of its functionalities correctly, the management of requirements within projects gets as reliable as it can get. > > **Puntos en contra**: As TraceCloud prioritizes reliability and strict methods, it doesn't have the most user friendly interface. The overall look on the pages are great, but sometimes you need to stop and analyse the options to comprehend the logic behind finding one or other resource. It takes some getting used to it. > > After the time spent understanding its logic and how things are tought, it gets intuitive and works as a flow. Now, I have my requirements sorted and can easily control which level of access different stakeholders have to them, do version tracking and export them in different and editable templates for MS Word and Excel. This being said, I'm satisfied with Tracecloud, and am having a positive experience working with it. ----- ### "Capable, but gets some of the basics wrong" — 3.0/5 > **Usuario verificado** | *23 de abril de 2019* | Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Good for creating an auditable set of linkages from "customer story" through requirements to test artifacts. > > **Puntos en contra**: Blows it on simple things. Every time I get logged out due to inactivity, the web client goes to a dead "Confirm form resubmission" page which doesn't actually work if you refresh. I have to manually reset the URL back to tracecloud.com or the login page. After login, I have to manually navigate back to the project I was using. Creating test records or other artifacts not always intuitive to the casual user. > > It was chosen for our team, so we use it. It gets the job done with respect to satisfying audit requirements, but the relative "pain" for the casual user means that we don't take as much advantage as we probably could. ----- ### "Requirements Tracing without the large price tag or high learning curve to get started" — 5.0/5 > **Jeffrey** | *18 de marzo de 2022* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The ability to begin using the tool productively right away - and without a large expense up front. The pricing model enabled us to take advantage of RTM without passing the cost on to our customers. Response to support issues has been very fast. > > **Puntos en contra**: The interface is basic (but has provided everything we have needed to manage the requirements for our initial project). Improvements are being made quickly (several new features have been added since we began using TraceCloud) > > The overall experience has been very positive and product. ----- ### "Very useful cheap requirements management tool and a great support team" — 4.0/5 > **Gurunathan** | *10 de agosto de 2022* | Dispositivos médicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The traceability (Trace Tree feature) is what I like the most in this tool. Once you export the tracetree into an excel file, what you see is different heirarchy of requirements and test cases and reports neatly organised and is a visual treat. > > **Puntos en contra**: The reporting feature needs customisation and client's documentation templates friendly > > Overall, for the price, this tool is a great one to have though it has some limitations. If you're looking for traceability and version management as your primary asks, then this is a go to tool for requirements management. ----- Página: 1 de 4\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/135649/tracecloud?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/135649/tracecloud) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados