--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de LILT? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de LILT gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: LILT - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Programas de traducción](/directory/30934/translation-management/software) > [LILT](/software/204322/lilt) # LILT Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/204322/lilt Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/204322/lilt?page=2) > Lilt impulsa contenido de alta calidad y tiempos de devolución más rápidos con servicios y software de traducción habilitados por IA y basados en el trabajo de humanos. > > Veredicto: 85 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa LILT? Lilt presta servicios a clientes de los sectores de tecnología empresarial y de consumo, comercio minorista y comercio electrónico, fabricación, juegos, servicios financieros, atención médica y gobierno. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 85 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: LILT ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funciones - Automatización de la localización - Automatización proceso/flujo de trabajo - Gestión de documentos - Gestión de flujos de trabajo - Gestión de proyectos - Gestión terminológica - Herramientas de colaboración - Importación y exportación de datos - Portal de autoservicio - Reconocimiento de voz - Seguimiento del proyecto - Third-Party Integrations - Traducción automática - Varios idiomas ## Integraciones (en total: 28) - Adobe Commerce - Adobe Experience Manager - Box - Braze - CaptionHub - Contentful - Crowdin - Drupal - Figma - Git - GitHub - GitLab - Google Cloud - Google Drive - Helpshift … y 13 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Programas de traducción](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30934/translation-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Programas de traducción](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30934/translation-management/software) - [Software de inteligencia artificial](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30938/artificial-intelligence/software) - [Software para gestionar gobiernos](https://www.capterra.co/directory/20048/government/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Google Translate](https://www.capterra.co/software/1013631/google-translate) — 4.5/5 (687 reviews) 2. [Crowdin](https://www.capterra.co/software/163509/crowdin) — 4.7/5 (175 reviews) 3. [DeepL Pro](https://www.capterra.co/software/219412/deepl-pro) — 4.7/5 (154 reviews) 4. [Tolgee](https://www.capterra.co/software/1039225/tolgee) — 4.6/5 (95 reviews) 5. [Plytix](https://www.capterra.co/software/149113/plytix-pim) — 4.7/5 (90 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Accuracy in my own style" — 4.0/5 > **Sandra** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 5.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The accuracy of the translation is remarkable. What I like the most is that Lilt suggests new wording as you write, which shows that it really adapts to your own writing style. > > **Puntos en contra**: I didn't like that the Q\&A always show false positives. > > It is a great tool to stremline my translation work. ----- ### "Helpful, useful and improving" — 4.0/5 > **Ernesto** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 6.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Pre-translation quality. Existing pre-translation has significantly improved over the past year. > > **Puntos en contra**: 1) Propagation glitches. Pre-translated segments don't update previous (or subsequent) translations one you confirm a segment, which makes you have to look up similar segments to harmonize them. 2) Crashes/breaks: "Segment cannot be confirmed" pop-ups are, occasionally, rather frequent. 3) Erratic tag placement: time is lost relocating incorrectly placed tags in target. > > Generally positive. My turnaround times are improved thanks to to the existing pre-translation. ----- ### "Happy to work with and willing to be part of" — 5.0/5 > **Michele Fardini Soares 👩🏻‍💻 ⚙️ 💡** | *4 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The opportunity to work with different accounts and fields. I can utilize my skills in the Life Sciences for one task, but in another, I can apply my skills to technology, the music industry, and social media. I have been learning a lot because I can exercise and gain new knowledge from this experience, as I am always willing to grow. > > **Puntos en contra**: When I receive an email from LILT announcing a project to work on, and after some milliseconds, it is already unavailable. It's frustrating, and I got upset. It is almost impossible to get the job. I try to do it on my smartphone (iPhone), but I often have page errors, telling me that Chrome, Safari, Mozilla, and other browsers are not compatible. I have already reported this issue to PMs and support, but I continue experiencing problems. Additionally, I would like to inform you about the payment terms. It took too much time to complete the job—some of them, more than 45 days. > > I am proud to work for LILT. I already know many people from the team, and I received support; everyone helped when it was necessary. I have consistently demonstrated my interest in being part of the LILT team. As an engineer passionate about technology and language, I have a clear plan to utilize my knowledge of project management to become a Project Manager at LILT. I hope to join the LILT team, working remotely and collaborating with a team. ----- ### "Make Lilt a Better Place for Translators and Clients" — 5.0/5 > **Ning** | *5 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Quick AI-enhanced TM-based machine tanslation and reliable and transparent payments. > > **Puntos en contra**: 1. The least I like about Lilt is its current task assignment mechanism, a first-come, first-served system triggered by email notifications. Seemingly simple and straightforward, it fosters an environment prone to inefficiency and potential abuse. This system incentivizes a "race to the bottom," where translators may accept projects exceeding their expertise or available time simply to secure work. This ultimately risks delivering subpar translations, harming both client satisfaction and the platform's reputation. Furthermore, the reliance on speed of response opens the door for sophisticated bots or scripts to automatically claim assignments, leaving qualified human translators at a disadvantage. This undermines fair competition and potentially leads to a decline in overall translation quality. 2. Another annoying thing is that sometimes inconsistence can be found among accepted TMs. > > My experience with Lilt has been positive on the whole. The platform's interface is intuitive and user-friendly, particularly the in-context editor which allows for efficient translation. The payment system is generally reliable and transparent, which is crucial for freelancers. Finally, the availability of various project types and clients offers some degree of diversification in workload. The one thing I think needs to be improved is its task assignment mechanism. A more sophisticated approach would prioritize factors beyond speed of response. A system incorporating translator profiles, skills matching, and project-specific qualifications would be fairer, more efficient, and ultimately contribute to higher-quality translations. ----- ### "A good concept where some things fail" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *6 de abril de 2025* | Traducción y localización | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The Contextual AI engine works really well, and the payments are allways on time. > > **Puntos en contra**: Project teams raffle many jobs, who is the fastes in accepting gets the Job. This creates an atmosphere of competition instead a team consciousness. > > The tool works well, the job lists are a bit unclear, the jobs change their position each time you open them. Quality of fuzzy matches is often low, so I have the impression that quality control in German is failing. Seems there is no competent linguistic instance to oversee overall quality- ----- Página: 1 de 5\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/204322/lilt?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/204322/lilt) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados