--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de TestRail? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de TestRail gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestRail - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Herramientas de gestión de pruebas](/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) > [TestRail](/software/128204/testrail) # TestRail Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/128204/testrail Página: 1 de 8\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/128204/testrail?page=2) > Optimice su proceso de pruebas de Software gestionando tests con TestRail. Paneles de control en tiempo real e informes de actividad. > > Veredicto: 177 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.3/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa TestRail? Moderno software de gestión de casos de prueba para equipos de QA y desarrollo. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.3/5** | 177 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 80% | (8/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: IDERA - **Constitución**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: US$ 34,00 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Chromebook (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Belice y 209 más ## Funciones - Automated Testing - Controles o permisos de acceso - Creación de informes/análisis - Garantía de calidad - Gestión de pruebas de software - Gestión de repositorios - Gestión de requisitos - Gestión de tests - Herramientas de colaboración - Integración continua - Multiple Test Types - Prueba de carga - Seguimiento de defectos - Trazabilidad - Vista jerárquica ## Integraciones (en total: 29) - Asana - Assembla - Axosoft - Azure DevOps Server - Bitbucket - Bugzilla - CircleCI - ClickUp - Confluence - Cypress - DesignWise - FogBugz - Functionize - GitHub - GitLab … y 14 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Chat ## Categoría - [Herramientas de gestión de pruebas](https://www.capterra.co/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Herramientas de gestión de pruebas](https://www.capterra.co/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) - [Software para desarrollo de apps](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Herramientas para pruebas de usabilidad](https://www.capterra.co/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Software para pruebas de rendimiento](https://www.capterra.co/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) - [Herramientas de automatización de pruebas](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Alternativas 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.co/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (749 reviews) 2. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.co/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 3. [SpiraTest](https://www.capterra.co/software/70008/spiratest) — 4.0/5 (104 reviews) 4. [Testsigma](https://www.capterra.co/software/171626/testsigma) — 4.3/5 (19 reviews) 5. [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.capterra.co/software/120858/tricentis-tosca) — 4.2/5 (18 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "If you are executing manual test cases on a large scale then Test Rail is for you" — 4.0/5 > **Neil** | *20 de diciembre de 2018* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I think report generation is the strong suit of Test rail, the percentage pie chart of passed, failed blocked cases at a glance make daily reporting for scrum stand up meetings ideal. Integration with Jira is excellent, although some room for improvement. > > **Puntos en contra**: Trying to do something simple like import test case steps from a .csv is not so easy. You can import a suite but that is not ideal. Trying to duplicate cases can be tedious, let's say you have a lot of cases, trying to copy paste them in to various projects is a lot of hassle, it is surprising they have not addressed issues like this after so many years. > > Having using various test management suites TestRail does excel in that it was built to run manual test cases and display results in an easy glance for the whole team. Linking to defects is simple, generating a report when the test run is complete. I feel like reusing regression suites could be improved, it does what it is meant to however you have to repeat several steps each time you want to generate a regression suite. Some areas for improvement would be a test case type for API tests, I am sure everyone needs this but struggles to find a way to record this data. ----- ### "TestRail usage review" — 4.0/5 > **Pavitra** | *13 de octubre de 2025* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: TestRail is a perfect solution for testcase management. Our team uses the features of milestone creation, test runs and execution analytics of the tool. My favorite feature of TestRail is the ability to add custom fields that can be specific to your project needs. > > **Puntos en contra**: 1. I would like to use TestRail to expand the capabilities to add confluence documentations as well along with the Jira Tasks 2. Another thing I am not a fan of is the attachments maintenance. It is very hard to navigate to the attached documents or files from a testcase 3. Customer service is not great, we opened couple of issues over the period of time but the responses and updates were too slow or none. In short website performance is good but when you hit bugs there is a gap > > It is good, our company is using TestRail for over 5 years now. We like the easy of use of the tool. We use it for testcase management, test run creation and execution for functional and regression tests. Value for money is good. ----- ### "TestRail in 4 years" — 5.0/5 > **Rakhi** | *30 de marzo de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: it brings structure and consistency to testing by keeping test cases organized in a clear hierarchy, which makes it easy to maintain coverage over time. I also really value the way it supports repeatable execution through test runs and results tracking—so regression cycles feel more controlled, progress is visible at a glance, and there’s a reliable history of what was tested and what needs re-testing after the dev fixes. > > **Puntos en contra**: maintaining a large test library can feel a bit manual—bulk updates, reorganizing sections, or refactoring lots of cases takes time and can be tedious. The UI can also feel a little clunky in places (especially around editing steps and keeping formatting consistent), and reporting is sometimes not as flexible as you’d want without extra effort to slice results the way a team needs for release readiness. > > It’s a dependable tool for keeping test cases structured and making regression cycles repeatable, and it gives good visibility into what’s been executed and what still needs attention. Even though some parts could be smoother—especially around bulk maintenance and reporting—it’s still effective for organizing QA work and keeping a clear history of testing over time. ----- ### "Mid-level testing tool" — 1.0/5 > **isaac** | *23 de octubre de 2025* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 0.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I liked that it's been around for a long time so it has a lot of legacy features that have been around for a long time. > > **Puntos en contra**: The fact that it is a legacy tool, it feels old and complex to use. It's also very expensive. And customer service has paywalls. > > Generally mid, not impressed by it but it is a tool that has been around for a long time so it has a lot of general features. ----- ### "Quality Assured" — 5.0/5 > **Gerrit** | *2 de diciembre de 2024* | Software informático | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It helps our QA team with managing regression testing between multiple remote QA engineers. Adding new test cases is easy, and being able to go back and see who tested each case is extremely valuable. > > **Puntos en contra**: Getting all of our test cases moved over to TestRail was a huge undertaking, but once done, maintaining has been easy. > > TestRail was a huge step up from our previous process which was a Google Sheet. ----- Página: 1 de 8\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/128204/testrail?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/128204/testrail) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados