--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de FlexSim? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de FlexSim gracias a Capterra Colombia. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: FlexSim - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Colombia 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de simulación](/directory/30607/simulation/software) > [FlexSim](/software/107009/flexsim) # FlexSim Canonical: https://www.capterra.co/software/107009/flexsim Página: 1 de 6\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) > FlexSim es una herramienta poderosa para modelar, analizar, visualizar y optimizar cualquier proceso, desde la fabricación hasta las cadenas de suministro. > > Veredicto: 128 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.6/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa FlexSim? FlexSim es compatible con todos los ingenieros, gerentes y tomadores de decisiones que buscan validar, mejorar o simplemente aprender más sobre sus procesos existentes o planificados. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.6/5** | 128 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.6/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.5/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Autodesk - **Ubicación**: San Rafael, EE. UU. - **Constitución**: 1982 ## Contexto comercial - **Modelo de precios**: (versión gratuita disponible) (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1.000, 1.001-5.000, 5.001-10.000, 10.000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Windows (desktop), Windows (local) - **Idiomas admitidos**: chino, chino tradicional, inglés, japonés - **Países disponibles**: Alemania, Argelia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brasil, Bélgica, Canadá, Chile, China, Colombia, Corea del Sur, Dinamarca, Ecuador, Egipto, Eslovaquia, España, Estados Unidos, Filipinas, Finlandia y 30 más ## Funciones - Creación de informes/análisis - Herramientas de presentación - Imágenes en 3D - Manipulación directa - Modelado basado en agentes - Modelado continuo - Modelado de eventos discretos - Modelado del movimiento - Modelado dinámico - Modelado estocástico - Modelado matemático - Presentación gráfica de datos ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de simulación](https://www.capterra.co/directory/30607/simulation/software) ## Alternativas 1. [SIMUL8](https://www.capterra.co/software/114609/simul8-professional) — 4.6/5 (142 reviews) 2. [SimForm](https://www.capterra.co/software/1078103/SimForm) — 4.3/5 (3 reviews) 3. [AnyLogic](https://www.capterra.co/software/95940/anylogic) — 4.5/5 (518 reviews) 4. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.co/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2090 reviews) 5. [SolidWorks Simulation Premium](https://www.capterra.co/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium) — 4.4/5 (56 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Great looking and advanced simulations" — 5.0/5 > **Igor** | *20 de junio de 2019* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Great visualization makes it very pleasant to start learning; Lots of built-in features, Data import-export; Different modes (3D, ProcessFlow), where you can work simultaneously or independently; Strong statistics (distributions), that can be integrated on the models, collecting and presenting data; Anything you lack regarding the model or actor logic can be added as code snippets; Really basic models can be made in minutes > > **Puntos en contra**: It becomes difficult to learn it when you go in deep. The really basic actions are easy and intuitive, like for kids. But when you get to something just little more complex - it requires a lot of additional knowledge. Little community tutorials. There are not many community samples and tutorials on youtube or in the web. Most of them are over basic functions - you probably will need to enroll a training. > > I am a teacher in university. I had never worked with simulation software before, so it was my first software of such type. FlexSim is just a whole universe, with it's own logic and rules. If you want to do BIG things with it - you have to understand all of these rules, accept them and change your own thinking to follow that rules (to think like FlexSim would think). I am a very advanced user of Excel, and Excel is a large universe as well. But now I am wondering which of them is bigger. ----- ### "FlexSim is a Great Tool" — 4.0/5 > **Kavan** | *14 de junio de 2019* | Producción de alimentos | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: What I like most about FlexSim is the software's ease of use. I did trials on several other simulation software and FlexSim came out on top for me. It was intuitive and just simply made sense when building models. After the initial training I built a simulation model to represent one of our biggest production plants. Having that 3D visual was key in explaining processes to the rest of the team, and I could make real time changes in the model to work through those "what if" scenarios. The intricate details and the ability to allow viewers to see a different perspectives is actually very eye opening. > > **Puntos en contra**: What I like least about the software is the lack of floor levels that are representative of actual buildings. This might be minor, but I wished there were options for prebuilt stairs and different floor levels. Stairs and floor levels are common in plants, hospitals, airport, etc., so why not give the user those items in the toolbox. For example, if I wanted to simulate a building with three floors, with people walking from one floor to the other (not necessarily one above the other, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see the operation on the other floors), using a second and third elevated floor plan. Hopefully that makes sense. > > At the moment I use FlexSim to simulation the possibilities within a given confined space. I build models to represent a few different scenarios and demonstrate them to the team, so that leadership can make a decision on particular go/no-go criteria for a project. I use FlexSim to demonstrate possibilities that people in the viewing group might not have even considered, and generate new conversations regarding what's possible and which direction to go. ----- ### "Very pretty, but too hard to use if not in it often" — 3.0/5 > **Kate** | *15 de diciembre de 2025* | Hospital y atención sanitaria | Valoración de la recomendación: 3.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It was a very pretty way to show simulations that have real potential to be useful to show off to champions and project sponsors. > > **Puntos en contra**: I tried very hard and have a lot of background in simulation and couldn't get to a point where it made sense for our company to use it, I wasn't confident in the mathematical rigor of the simulations, and couldn't train my coworkers to use it, > > I really wanted to try like it but ended up not choosing it for the simulation software my company uses. ----- ### "Long time Simulation practitioner" — 5.0/5 > **Dhuey** | *20 de junio de 2019* | Alimentación y bebidas | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Very easy to build a simple model with the 3D Objects. The 3D objects have enough hooks in place to deal with more complex situations as well. There is no need to know programing language. The software is a tool that can be used by both the novice and experienced modeler. > > **Puntos en contra**: The users manual is a bit hard to follow, and missing some information. I would like more options for flow item shapes and shapes for resources. > > We are using FlexSim to evaluate a new production line, everything from equipment capability, line control logic and staffing. The data from the simulations has enabled us to reduce staffing, and equipment requirements. ----- ### "All purpose simulation software" — 5.0/5 > **Vincent** | *13 de junio de 2019* | Consultoría de gestión | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Stunning interactive 3D graphics, full programming capabilities (no external compiler needed), links with Excel and SQL databases, ability to customize anything and develop reusable libraries > > **Puntos en contra**: Limited cloud interactivity, too many new important features appearing, company focus seems to be on Process Flow module which is more complicated to use by programmers and less object-oriented > > I simulate mining sites (surface and underground), mine-to-port logistics, food and beverage plants, airport baggage handling systems, mechanical workshops, manufacturing assembly lines, distribution centers, distribution networks, supply chains, rail and road transport systems. Very visual although visual can be turned off or ignored, very efficient flexscript language, I can simulate a wide range of industries with a single tool. ----- Página: 1 de 6\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co/software/107009/flexsim) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Datos estructurados